As technology advances at a rapid pace, the significance of manual testing in the software development process remains unwavering. Despite the growing popularity of automation testing, the human element in manual testing brings invaluable benefits that cannot be replaced. In this blog, we will explore the scope of manual testing in the upcoming future and how it complements automation, ensuring top-notch software quality and user satisfaction.
Scope of manual testing in the future
The manual testing phase is thought of as the first testing stage, and it generally assesses the behavior of the built app by completing a step-by-step evaluation of the requirement specification analysis record. Manual testing’s main goal is to make sure the software functions correctly without any bugs or functional flaws, and that it complies with the required specification documents.
In terms of requirements and functionality, manual testing will likely resemble software development in the future. It is clear from the modifications and operational advancements in manual testing that manual testers must expand their abilities and everyday working habits. In terms of development/special testing tools, leadership skills, logical thinking, and process analysis, testers who exclusively use manual testing processes should upgrade their skills with new technologies and automation testing frameworks. You could now wonder what the testers are meant to do, which is:
- to improve their knowledge of development processes and important topics in programming.
- a working knowledge of the code.
- To increase ROI, find out more about how the company runs.
- ability to engage in management-related activities.
These are the essential steps that raise them to the level of a Test Analyst and effectively give them SME [Subject Matter Expert] responsibilities. Thus, manual testing is going to survive for a very long time with all of the new and innovative automated testing tools that are launched, as well as with all of its fundamental concepts to be created and employed with the necessary adjustments in every Software Development/Web App development process. For a very long time, manual testing and automation testing will work in cooperation.
- Human-Centric Testing for Enhanced User Experience
Manual testing enables testers to adopt a user’s perspective and simulate real-world scenarios, leading to improved user experience. While automation is excellent for repetitive tasks, manual testers can identify nuanced issues, conduct exploratory testing, and empathize with end-users. This human-centric approach guarantees that the software meets user expectations, resulting in increased customer satisfaction.
- Tackling Complex and Niche Scenarios
Automation is effective in executing predefined test cases, but manual testing shines in handling complex and niche scenarios that demand human intelligence. Testers can creatively design test cases beyond the scope of automated scripts, ensuring that every corner of the software is thoroughly examined. This versatility makes manual testing indispensable for diverse applications and specialized use cases.
- Agile and DevOps Adaptability
In the dynamic Agile and DevOps environments, manual testing proves to be more flexible and adaptable than automation. Testers can quickly adjust test cases based on ever-changing requirements and provide early feedback during the development cycle. Integrating manual testers into the development process promotes seamless communication, fostering collaboration between teams.
- Early and Continuous Feedback
Manual testing allows testers to begin evaluating requirements and designs before any code is written. This early involvement enables testers to spot potential issues and risks early on, leading to faster bug resolution and a more streamlined development process. Continuously providing feedback throughout the development lifecycle ensures that the software aligns with stakeholders’ expectations.
- User Acceptance Testing (UAT)
User acceptance testing is crucial for ensuring that the software meets end-users needs and business objectives. Manual testing excels in UAT by facilitating direct interactions with users, gathering valuable feedback, and validating user workflows. This ensures that the final product aligns perfectly with user expectations, ultimately boosting its success in the market.
Conclusion
In the future, the scope of manual testing will remain indispensable in software development. Its human-centric approach, adaptability in agile environments, and emphasis on user experience make it an invaluable asset. Manual testing complements automation, providing comprehensive test coverage and delivering superior software quality. By embracing both manual and automated testing, businesses can ensure their software is reliable, user-friendly, and ready to meet the challenges of the future.
Ultimately, or in a nutshell, manual testing cannot be completely replaced. Automated testing is now necessary for carrying out test tasks including load testing, regression testing, and performance testing. If we are not concerned about the manual testing approach, the testing process will not be comprehensive and there may be functional concerns. Testing by hand is far more trustworthy than testing by automation, and during the manual testing process, abilities like inference, inductive reasoning, and human intuition are employed. These elements can’t be totally replaced by automation.
THANKS FOR YOUR PRECIOUS TIME
EPEDAGOGUE GLOBAL PVT LTD
YOUR MENTOR
PRAKASH CHAND THAPLIYAL
