In the realm of software development, ensuring the quality and reliability of a product is of paramount importance. To achieve this, various review techniques are employed, with walkthroughs and inspections being two commonly utilized methods. Both serve the purpose of detecting defects and improving software quality, but they differ in approach and participants. In this blog, we will explore the Difference between walkthroughs and inspections in software testing while providing real-life examples to illustrate their significance.
Difference Between Walkthrough And Inspection
| Inspection | Walkthrough |
|---|---|
| Formal | Informal |
| Initiated by the project team | Initiated by the author |
| The reader reads the product code. Everyone inspects it and comes up with defects. | Unplanned. |
| The recorder records the defects | The author makes a note of defects and suggestions offered by a teammate |
| The moderator has a role in making sure that the discussions proceed on the productive lines | The author makes a note of defects and suggestions offered by teammate |
| The author makes a note of defects and suggestions offered by a teammate | Informal, so there is no moderator |
Inspection
The purpose of the inspection is to confirm that a product complies with the rules and regulations that have been set out. In order to achieve this, the product is examined and put through a comparison process with the designs, code, objects, and any other available documentation. For inspections to be held properly, there must be good planning, and overviews of the planning must be done. It takes a lot of planning and meetings to conduct inspections, after which rework is completed based on the inspection’s input.
A company that cares about the quality of the product should use inspection as a process that has been carefully considered. The quality control division is in charge of the procedure.
Inspection is a systematic method for identifying and fixing software code defects.
Example of an Inspection:
Imagine a software development team has completed the coding phase of a critical module in their accounting software. Before proceeding to the testing phase, they decide to conduct an inspection. The inspection is led by a moderator who is not directly involved in the development of the module. The inspection team, consisting of experienced developers and QA professionals, follows a checklist that covers design patterns, coding standards, security considerations, and potential corner cases. The goal is to uncover any issues or deviations from the coding guidelines to ensure a high-quality codebase.
Inspection Example – Real-Life Problem:
Consider a software development team working on an open-source project that involves complex algorithms for image processing. The team has completed the initial implementation and is preparing to release the code to the public. However, before the release, they want to ensure that the codebase is of high quality and adheres to coding standards and best practices.
To achieve this, the team decides to conduct an inspection. They assemble a group of experienced developers and subject matter experts who are familiar with image processing algorithms. The inspection team uses a predefined checklist that includes coding guidelines, algorithm correctness, boundary cases, error handling, and performance considerations.
As the inspection progresses, the team identifies some potential issues, such as inefficient memory usage in certain algorithms and minor deviations from the coding style guide. These findings are documented, and the development team rectifies the identified issues before the public release. By conducting the inspection, the development team ensures that the open-source project is of high quality, well-optimized, and ready for use by the wider community.
Roles in Inspections:
a. Moderator:
A moderator is an impartial person who is not directly involved in the development of the software being inspected. Their role is to oversee the inspection process, ensure adherence to the inspection checklist, and guide the team through the inspection phases.
b. Inspection Team:
The inspection team consists of qualified and experienced individuals, usually comprising peers, developers, testers, and subject matter experts. They diligently review the software product, identify defects, and assess its compliance with coding standards, specifications, and requirements.
c. Recorder:
The recorder takes notes during the inspection process, documenting identified defects and other relevant findings. This documentation serves as the basis for subsequent corrective actions and improvements.
d. Author (Optional):
Unlike in walkthroughs, the author’s presence during inspections is optional. However, having the author available during the inspection can provide valuable insights and clarifications on specific code segments or design decisions.
Walkthroughs
Walkthroughs: The author shows the audience of peers their developed artifacts. Peers examine and evaluate the item to find as many defects as they can. The audience need not prepare in advance. little recording of the procedure or any problems that may arise is typical. Inconsistent defect tracking is present in walkthroughs.
A walk-through is a method of evaluation that is a casual meeting and does not call for prior preparation.
The produced describes the item and requests feedback from the audience. Instead of correcting the product, the results educate the participants about it.
Example of a Walkthrough:
Let’s consider a scenario where a software developer has completed the implementation of a new feature in an e-commerce website. The developer schedules a walkthrough with the Quality Assurance (QA) team, the product manager, and some other relevant stakeholders. The developer presents the new feature, demonstrates how it works, explains the code logic, and answers any questions the attendees have. During this process, the attendees may identify potential issues or suggest improvements, which are then noted and addressed by the developer.
Walkthrough Example – Real-Life Problem:
Suppose a software development team is working on creating a mobile banking application. During the development process, they implemented a new feature that allows users to transfer funds between their accounts. However, there is a concern about the security of the transaction process. To address this, the development team decides to conduct a walkthrough.
In the walkthrough, the developer responsible for the fund transfer feature presents the code logic, and security measures implemented, and demonstrates how the transaction works step by step. The attendees, including senior developers, security experts, and business analysts, actively participate in the discussion, asking questions, and providing feedback. Through this process, the team identifies potential security vulnerabilities and suggests additional measures to enhance the security of the transaction process. As a result of the walkthrough, the team gains valuable insights, makes necessary improvements, and gains confidence that the fund transfer feature is secure and robust.
Roles in Walkthroughs:
a. Author (Developer/Presenter):
The author is the person responsible for creating the software or a specific portion of it. They lead the walkthrough session by presenting their work, explaining the code, design, or functionality, and answering questions from the attendees.
b. Reviewers:
Reviewers are the individuals participating in the walkthrough session. They can be members of the development team, quality assurance (QA) team, product managers, stakeholders, or subject matter experts. Reviewers actively listen to the author’s presentation, provide feedback, and raise questions or concerns about the software being reviewed.
c. Facilitator (Optional):
In some cases, there might be a facilitator who moderates the walkthrough process. The facilitator ensures that the session stays on track, allocates time for discussions, and encourages active participation from all attendees.
Example: In a walkthrough for a new feature in a web application, the author could be the developer who implemented the feature. The reviewers may include QA testers, the product manager, and other relevant stakeholders.
Conclusion:
Both walkthroughs and inspections play critical roles in software testing, with each offering unique benefits. Walkthroughs foster collaboration, allow for feedback, and promote knowledge sharing among stakeholders. On the other hand, inspections provide a rigorous and structured approach to identifying defects and ensuring compliance with standards and requirements. Selecting the appropriate review technique depends on the specific needs and goals of the software development process.
By integrating both walkthroughs and inspections into the software development life cycle, organizations can enhance product quality, reduce defects, and deliver software that meets the highest standards of reliability and user satisfaction.
THANKS FOR YOUR PRECIOUS TIME
EPEDAGOGUE GLOBAL PVT LTD
YOUR MENTOR
PRAKASH CHAND THAPLIYAL
